During his Oasis event coverage, Joe briefly covered Code 777. I am not generally a huge fan of deduction games, but I wanted to try this since it has gotten such rave reviews from my friends.
Code 777 is a classic deduction game from 1986 in which players simply have to guess the number in front of them to get points. Each player is given a stand where three cards with numbers (1-7) of different colors are placed, facing toward the middle of the table. An individual player can see everyone else’s cards but not his or her own. Throughout the course of the game, players use deduction and logic to figure out which numbers are in front of them.
Gameplay:
In clockwise order, each player draws a question card, reads the question, and then answers it based on what they see in front of them. For example, my card might ask, “Do you see more red numbers or more black numbers?” I would look at all of the cards I can see and say “more red”, “more black”, or “the same” based on what I see.
After hearing the answer, the other players take notes on their player sheets and cross off numbers that they can logically eliminate as being in front of them. To aid in the process of elimination, each player sheet has a list of all the numbers in the correct color and distribution within the deck. A player may make a guess on his or her own numbers at any time. A correct guess is worth one point. If the guess is incorrect, the numbers are revealed, and the player she gets three new numbers to start figuring out. A player can make as many wrong guesses in a game as he or she likes.
If at any point the numbers deck runs out, it is re-shuffled. Once a player gets three points, the game is over and that player has won.
Review:
There is a reason this game is called a classic. The idea is simple, the mechanics are simple, the pieces are simple, but this can be quite a deep game.
Personally, I generally find deduction games to be a bit too heavy and taxing to be fun. Since Code 777 is short, moves quickly, has very concise play and a short set of rules, it does not feel overly heavy, exceedingly taxing, or too drawn-out. It does require serious thought, and there are lots of subtle complexities to figuring out your number. The game design is well-balanced and does not have any broken elements. All of the questions are helpful in some way; some are more helpful than others, but none ever feel like they’re completely useless or give the answer away.
The components for this game, regardless of which edition you have, are very basic: colored number cards or cardboard tiles, question cards, deduction sheets with numbers on them, and stands to place cards or tiles on. However, the components don’t actually need to be fancy for this game. In fact, too fancy, and they would detract from the ability of the players to focus on the task at hand. The only criticism I have of this game is related to the stands. The stands in all versions of the game could be taller and sturdier. In fact, I know of several people who have made or bought custom stands just for this reason.
Pros: Brilliantly simple mechanics, fairly fast paced for a deduction game, the process of deduction is complex but not overwhelming.
Cons: The stands leave something to be desired.
Overall Impression: It’s not Agricola or Dungeon Lords (and it doesn’t have pieces I can build towers out of), but Code 777 is absolutely the best deduction game I have ever encountered, and it’s a game I would always be happy to play.
Rating: 8.5
Editor’s note: Code 777 has been out of print for several years, leading to many custom “homebrew” versions. Stronghold Games has announced a new, updated, official reprint coming sometime later this summer. Check out their website for details.
Interview: Dominion's Donald X. Vaccarino
Two-Player Games That Won't Wreck Your Marriage
Five Sites to Get Your Boardgaming Fix Online
You know, Stronghold Games is coming out with a brand-new version of Code 777 supposedly in August. It will have nice plastic/bakelite tiles and sounds pretty cool. They just started the pre-order for it a few days ago.
Yep! I had appended a note about this after publishing this review, but I’m not sure I got it in before the RSS feed was picked up. Thanks!